Capstone Project Proposal Comparison

Isabel Budenz - Three Project Options

January 16, 2026


Executive Comparison

DimensionInstitutional InnovationRegulatory & PPPTechnical Skills
TitleAI Arbitration Governance FrameworkNavigating the AI Regulatory PatchworkResponsible AI Integration in Legal Practice
Duration12 weeks12 weeks12 weeks
Primary FocusHow arbitral institutions adopt & govern AICross-border compliance & multi-stakeholder governanceHands-on AI tool proficiency & implementation
Output TypeResearch + Model RulesFrameworks + Compliance ToolsPlaybooks + Training Programs
Learning StyleResearch & AnalysisResearch & SynthesisLearning by Doing

Strategic Positioning

AspectInstitutional InnovationRegulatory & PPPTechnical Skills
Career TrajectoryAI governance specialist for dispute resolutionCross-border AI compliance & policy expertLegal engineer / AI implementation lead
DifferentiationNiche expertise (arbitration + AI)Broad regulatory knowledgePractical technical competence
Market DemandGrowing (institutional transformation)High (EU AI Act compliance)Very High (79% firms adopted AI)
CompetitionLow (few combine arbitration + AI)Medium (many policy analysts)Medium-Low (few lawyers have hands-on skills)
Thought LeadershipHigh (model rules contribution)High (framework development)Medium (practical vs. theoretical)

Alignment with Isabel’s Background

Background ElementInstitutional InnovationRegulatory & PPPTechnical Skills
LLM International Commercial Arbitration★★★★★ Direct alignment★★☆☆☆ Tangential★★☆☆☆ Tangential
LLB International & European Law★★★☆☆ Supports analysis★★★★★ Core foundation★★★☆☆ Ethical framework
EU AI Act Coursework★★★☆☆ Regulatory context★★★★★ Central focus★★★☆☆ Compliance context
A for Arbitration Experience★★★★★ Direct relevance★★☆☆☆ Research skills★★☆☆☆ Research skills
Multilingual (DE/ES/EN/FR)★★★★☆ Institutional research★★★★★ EU member state analysis★★☆☆☆ Limited application
Clifford Chance Internship★★★☆☆ Firm context★★★★☆ Regulatory exposure★★★☆☆ Firm context
Legend: ★★★★★ = Perfect fit★☆☆☆☆ = Minimal relevance

Deliverables Comparison

Institutional Innovation (6 deliverables)

#DeliverablePages/FormatWeek
1Institutional Guidelines Comparative Analysis30-35 pages4
2Due Process Assessment Framework20 pages + Tool6
3Model AI Disclosure ProtocolProtocol + Templates8
4Enforceability Analysis Memo15-20 pages9
5Proposed Model Rules10-15 pages + Commentary11
6Executive Presentation & Training25 slides + Guide12

Regulatory & PPP (6 deliverables)

#DeliverablePages/FormatWeek
1Global AI Regulatory Landscape Map40 pages + Visual Map4
2Public-Private Partnership Analysis25 pages6
3Federal-State Preemption Risk Assessment15 pages + Decision Tree7
4Multi-Stakeholder Governance Framework30 pages + Implementation Guide10
5Compliance Mapping ToolsExcel/Interactive + Checklists11
6Standards Engagement Strategy10 pages + Presentation12

Technical Skills (6 deliverables + 2 certifications)

#DeliverablePages/FormatWeek
1AI Tool Proficiency Log30+ pages (ongoing)10
2AI Tool Evaluation Framework20 pages + Scorecard5
3Prompt Engineering Playbook40+ pages + Prompt Library8
4ABA Opinion 512 Compliance ChecklistChecklist + Guide9
5Firm-Wide AI Policy TemplatesTemplates + Adoption Guide11
6Training Curriculum & MaterialsCurriculum + Slides + Exercises12
+Clio Legal AI Fundamentals CertCertificate2
+Prompt Engineering for Law CertCertificate6

Skills Developed

Skill CategoryInstitutional InnovationRegulatory & PPPTechnical Skills
Legal Research★★★★★★★★★★★★★☆☆
Comparative Analysis★★★★★★★★★★★★☆☆☆
Policy Development★★★★★★★★★☆★★★☆☆
Technical AI Understanding★★☆☆☆★★☆☆☆★★★★★
Hands-on Tool Proficiency★☆☆☆☆★☆☆☆☆★★★★★
Prompt Engineering★☆☆☆☆★☆☆☆☆★★★★★
Compliance Implementation★★★☆☆★★★★★★★★★☆
Training Delivery★★★☆☆★★☆☆☆★★★★★
Stakeholder Engagement★★★★☆★★★★★★★★☆☆
Framework Design★★★★☆★★★★★★★★★☆

Key Research Sources by Proposal

Institutional Innovation

  • AAA-ICDR AI Arbitrator documentation
  • ICC Commission Task Force materials
  • CIArb, SCC, VIAC guidelines
  • White & Case 2025 International Arbitration Survey
  • New York Convention case law
  • UNESCO Guidelines on AI in Courts

Regulatory & PPP

  • EU AI Act (full text + AI Office guidance)
  • US Executive Orders (Dec 2025 preemption order)
  • State AI laws (CO, CA, NY, IL)
  • NIST AI Risk Management Framework
  • ISO/IEC 42001 standards
  • Partnership on AI publications

Technical Skills

  • ABA Formal Opinion 512
  • State bar AI guidance (NY, CA, PA)
  • Legal AI tool documentation
  • Coursera/Clio certification materials
  • Industry reports on legal AI adoption
  • Prompt engineering literature

Risk Comparison

Risk TypeInstitutional InnovationRegulatory & PPPTechnical Skills
Regulatory ChangeMedium (ICC guidance pending)High (active policy shifts)Low (stable ethical framework)
Scope CreepMediumHighMedium
Access/ResourcesLow (public materials)Low (public materials)Medium (tool subscriptions)
Learning CurveLow (legal research focus)Medium (multi-framework)High (technical skills)
Stakeholder ComplexityMediumHighMedium
Deliverable AmbiguityLow (clear outputs)Medium (framework scope)Low (concrete artifacts)

Overall Risk Level:

  • Institutional Innovation: Low-Medium
  • Regulatory & PPP: Medium
  • Technical Skills: Medium-High (but highest reward)

Budget Comparison

ItemInstitutionalRegulatoryTechnical
Database accessExistingExistingExisting
Standards/certifications-$500 (ISO)$100 (Coursera)
Tool subscriptions--$500
External consultation$1,000--
Conference/events$300$400-
Materials--$100
Total$1,300$900$700

Timeline Comparison

Week-by-Week Overview

WeekInstitutional InnovationRegulatory & PPPTechnical Skills
1Data collectionEU AI Act deep diveClio cert + conceptual learning
2Literature reviewEU member state analysisEthics deep dive
3Comparison frameworkUS federal analysisInitial tool exploration
4Institutional ReportRegulatory Landscape MapLegal research tools
5Due process researchPPP researchEvaluation Framework + contracts
6Due Process FrameworkPPP AnalysisPrompt engineering cert
7Disclosure protocol draftPreemption AssessmentPrompt playbook development
8Disclosure ProtocolFramework designPrompt Playbook
9Enforceability MemoFramework documentationCompliance Checklist
10Model rules draftingGovernance FrameworkProficiency Log + policy draft
11Model RulesCompliance ToolsPolicy Templates
12Presentation + TrainingEngagement StrategyTraining Curriculum

Employer Value Proposition

What Each Proposal Demonstrates to Employers

ProposalKey DemonstrationEmployer Benefit
Institutional“I can shape industry standards”Thought leadership, institutional credibility
Regulatory“I can navigate complex multi-jurisdictional compliance”Risk mitigation, global operations support
Technical“I can implement AI tools responsibly”Immediate productivity, training capability

Ideal Employer Types

Employer TypeInstitutionalRegulatoryTechnical
AI Company (Anthropic, OpenAI)★★★☆☆★★★★★★★★★☆
Big Law Firm★★★★★★★★★☆★★★★★
Arbitral Institution (ICC, LCIA)★★★★★★★★☆☆★★☆☆☆
Think Tank (GovAI, FPF)★★★★☆★★★★★★★☆☆☆
In-House Legal (Tech Company)★★★☆☆★★★★★★★★★★
Legal Tech Company★★★☆☆★★★☆☆★★★★★
Government/Regulator★★★☆☆★★★★★★★☆☆☆

Recommendation Matrix

Choose Institutional Innovation If:

  • ✅ You want to leverage your LLM specialization directly
  • ✅ You’re interested in dispute resolution careers long-term
  • ✅ You want to contribute to emerging industry standards
  • ✅ You prefer research-intensive work
  • ✅ You want lower-risk, clearly-scoped deliverables

Choose Regulatory & PPP If:

  • ✅ You want broad exposure to AI governance landscape
  • ✅ You’re interested in policy/government affairs careers
  • ✅ You want to maximize use of multilingual capabilities
  • ✅ You’re comfortable with ambiguity and evolving requirements
  • ✅ You want to understand multi-stakeholder dynamics

Choose Technical Skills If:

  • ✅ You want to differentiate from other legal professionals
  • ✅ You’re interested in legal tech or implementation roles
  • ✅ You learn best by doing rather than reading
  • ✅ You want certifications to credential your AI knowledge
  • ✅ You’re comfortable with a steeper learning curve

Hybrid Approach Option

If the internship allows flexibility, consider combining elements:

Recommended Hybrid: Institutional + Technical (Lite)

PhaseFocusWeeks
1Tool proficiency building + Clio cert1-2
2Institutional comparative analysis3-6
3Due process framework + disclosure protocol7-9
4Model rules + prompt playbook for arbitration10-12

This combines Isabel’s arbitration expertise with practical AI skills, producing both thought leadership deliverables and demonstrable technical competence.


Summary Decision Framework

If Your Priority Is…Choose
Leveraging LLM specializationInstitutional Innovation
Broadest career applicabilityRegulatory & PPP
Standing out from other candidatesTechnical Skills
Lowest execution riskInstitutional Innovation
Highest learning growthTechnical Skills
Multilingual advantage maximizationRegulatory & PPP
Immediate employer valueTechnical Skills
Long-term thought leadershipInstitutional Innovation

Comparison prepared January 2026

, , ,

was published on .